Thursday, November 24, 2005

Meshes of the Afternoon (2nd Meditation)

“What I meant when I planned that four stride sequence was that you have to come a long way – from the very beginning of time – to kill yourself, like the first life emerging from the primeval waters.”
Maya Deren from a letter to James Card, April 19th, 1955

“…and finally, film itself, changes the widow into a bride.”

And it may occur that, of an afternoon, these restive captives of memory – refreshed by new contexts and released by the lax discipline of sleep – may triumphantly regain the province of actuality.
Maya Deren, from 1960 “program notes”*

You can imagine the not yet
the no longer
dead shadow picks
a shadow a
shadow to begin

With subjective
to begin
one desires across
time form

The form of
the shadows of
a flower - here
we begin yet
to double here

You decide
this double the
widow not yet
of ritual

No longer dead - or not
a widow any
longer when you move
when you
move with
what the shadow starts
the subject
of song to initialize

Your death not yet
yet a universe
for your death
and the objective
the objective
of all form

For the widow to become
a bride
key to palm
Sunday – those girls
always sung
by carol / canon
to become

of a weapon – in spring
time again
floating - a leap
in reverse
cuts to dance form

Form Sunday
again no longer
seeing to be

With mirrors
for eyes a critical
emotion a complex
to be sung
to transfigure or
carry over
from verse to verse
mirrors for eyes

Or eyes for mirrors

Years or

A single
mirror for the
face those girls
if taking life would not be
taking life
as if at the end again
of every evolution cut
to carry across
forms the rigors
of which we are always
you are always
to take

Again no longer
seeking merely to be

Recussitated and suicided both in a dream

Is to keep dreaming and is to
no longer dream
however unwoken
by a form

The shadows
of form to pick
a flower is to recur
to all time it is to entrance
to find
entrance – the portal
of all lives

Images to pick
a key or a knife

Dynamite is no choice
emotional volitions objects
to which
the shattered the
accreted recur –
a complex

This too is experience
the occulted
bride not spoken
on film
the throat
one must imagine
broken but not slit

Are these the hells you must pass
through the mirrors through which
you shoot holes to ever be?

To keep seeking

To by necessity
be the bride
the widow
turned bride
of all these walks
cuts of life

again in a time
not yet your own
the mirror-breath
the breath on
the mirror
in a time not yet
and again memory
nearly as inexhaustible
and shattered by

*all three epigraphs from Essential Deren (Documentext, 2005), ed. Bruce McPherson

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

This Is Your Brain Under Hypnosis

Below is a transcript of an interesting article published yesterday in the NY Times, compliments of the "virtual" subscription of my friend, Abby Walton. Perhaps this article confirms what many of us already suspected about mind / body relations?

There is only one time any one has tried to hypnotize me with my consent (of course we are suspeptible to hypnosis all the time from media sources, attentional dynamics of "every day"), and that was in Tony Conrad's 2000 Contemporary Alternative Media seminar. During one of the class periods Conrad read from the sessions and exercises of the "hypnotherapist," Milton Erickson (who's a good read for any one interested in hypnosis and language pragmatics / performance). Conrad's performance of the text was very effective, putting most of the class in trance as far as I could tell. Confirming the below findings, the people who seemed least affected were myself and others pursuing degrees in English / languages, etc. (ones involving extensive "close" reading / writing). Those students working primarily with (tele)visual media seemed to "fall" much more easily.

I am glad to know hypnosis is being taken seriously by science since understanding it better is obviously a "key to consciousness". If only such researchers could link up w/ folks like Conrad who have brought research into aesthetic, pedagogic, and practical realms. As a threshhold for attention and therefore mind is hypnosis not a means to analyzing disciplinary modes and flows of power within cultures, especially highly mediatized ones? A politics of "feedforward" and "feedback"? Not to mention, as always, a poetics...

This Is Your Brain Under Hypnosis

Published: November 22, 2005

Hypnosis, with its long and checkered history in medicine and entertainment, is receiving some new respect from neuroscientists. Recent brain studies of people who are susceptible to suggestion indicate that when they act on the suggestions their brains show profound changes in how they process information. The suggestions, researchers report, literally change what people see, hear, feel and believe to be true.

The new experiments, which used brain imaging, found that people who were hypnotized "saw" colors where there were none. Others lost the ability to make simple decisions. Some people looked at common English words and thought that they were gibberish.

"The idea that perceptions can be manipulated by expectations" is fundamental to the study of cognition, said Michael I. Posner, an emeritus professor of neuroscience at the University of Oregon and expert on attention. "But now we're really getting at the mechanisms."

Even with little understanding of how it works, hypnosis has been used in medicine since the 1950's to treat pain and, more recently, as a treatment for anxiety, depression, trauma, irritable bowel syndrome and eating disorders.
There is, however, still disagreement about what exactly the hypnotic state is or, indeed, whether it is anything more than an effort to please the hypnotist or a natural form of extreme concentration where people become oblivious to their surroundings while lost in thought.

Hypnosis had a false start in the 18th century when a German physician, Dr. Franz Mesmer, devised a miraculous cure for people suffering all manner of unexplained medical problems. Amid dim lights and ethereal music played on a glass harmonica, he infused them with an invisible "magnetic fluid" that only he was able to muster. Thus mesmerized, clients were cured.

Although Dr. Mesmer was eventually discredited, he was the first person to show that the mind could be manipulated by suggestion to affect the body, historians say. This central finding was resurrected by Dr. James Braid, an English ophthalmologist who in 1842 coined the word hypnosis after the Greek word for sleep.

Braid reportedly put people into trances by staring at them intently, but he did not have a clue as to how it worked. In this vacuum, hypnosis was adopted by spiritualists and stage magicians who used dangling gold watches to induce hypnotic states in volunteers from the audience, and make them dance, sing or pretend to be someone else, only to awaken at a hand clap and laughter from the crowd.

In medical hands, hypnosis was no laughing matter. In the 19th century, physicians in India successfully used hypnosis as anesthesia, even for limb amputations. The practice fell from favor only when ether was discovered.

Now, Dr. Posner and others said, new research on hypnosis and suggestion is providing a new view into the cogs and wheels of normal brain function.

One area that it may have illuminated is the processing of sensory data. Information from the eyes, ears and body is carried to primary sensory regions in the brain. From there, it is carried to so-called higher regions where interpretation occurs.
For example, photons bouncing off a flower first reach the eye, where they are turned into a pattern that is sent to the primary visual cortex. There, the rough shape of the flower is recognized. The pattern is next sent to a higher - in terms of function - region, where color is recognized, and then to a higher region, where the flower's identity is encoded along with other knowledge about the particular bloom.

The same processing stream, from lower to higher regions, exists for sounds, touch and other sensory information. Researchers call this direction of flow feedforward. As raw sensory data is carried to a part of the brain that creates a comprehensible, conscious impression, the data is moving from bottom to top.

Bundles of nerve cells dedicated to each sense carry sensory information. The surprise is the amount of traffic the other way, from top to bottom, called feedback. There are 10 times as many nerve fibers carrying information down as there are carrying it up.

These extensive feedback circuits mean that consciousness, what people see, hear, feel and believe, is based on what neuroscientists call "top down processing." What you see is not always what you get, because what you see depends on a framework built by experience that stands ready to interpret the raw information - as a flower or a hammer or a face.

The top-down structure explains a lot. If the construction of reality has so much top-down processing, that would make sense of the powers of placebos (a sugar pill will make you feel better), nocebos (a witch doctor will make you ill), talk therapy and meditation. If the top is convinced, the bottom level of data will be overruled.
Skip to next paragraph

This brain structure would also explain hypnosis, which is all about creating such formidable top-down processing that suggestions overcome reality.

According to decades of research, 10 to 15 percent of adults are highly hypnotizable, said Dr. David Spiegel, a psychiatrist at Stanford who studies the clinical uses of hypnosis. Up to age 12, however, before top-down circuits mature, 80 to 85 percent of children are highly hypnotizable.

One adult in five is flat out resistant to hypnosis, Dr. Spiegel said. The rest are in between, he said.

In some of the most recent work, Dr. Amir Raz, an assistant professor of clinical neuroscience at Columbia, chose to study highly hypnotizable people with the help of a standard psychological test that probes conflict in the brain. As a professional magician who became a scientist to understand better the slippery nature of attention, Dr. Raz said that he "wanted to do something really impressive" that other neuroscientists could not ignore.

The probe, called the Stroop test, presents words in block letters in the colors red, blue, green and yellow. The subject has to press a button identifying the color of the letters. The difficulty is that sometimes the word RED is colored green. Or the word YELLOW is colored blue.

For people who are literate, reading is so deeply ingrained that it invariably takes them a little bit longer to override the automatic reading of a word like RED and press a button that says green. This is called the Stroop effect.
Sixteen people, half highly hypnotizable and half resistant, went into Dr. Raz's lab after having been covertly tested for hypnotizability. The purpose of the study, they were told, was to investigate the effects of suggestion on cognitive performance. After each person underwent a hypnotic induction, Dr. Raz said:

"Very soon you will be playing a computer game inside a brain scanner. Every time you hear my voice over the intercom, you will immediately realize that meaningless symbols are going to appear in the middle of the screen. They will feel like characters in a foreign language that you do not know, and you will not attempt to attribute any meaning to them.

"This gibberish will be printed in one of four ink colors: red, blue, green or yellow. Although you will only attend to color, you will see all the scrambled signs crisply. Your job is to quickly and accurately depress the key that corresponds to the color shown. You can play this game effortlessly. As soon as the scanning noise stops, you will relax back to your regular reading self."

Dr. Raz then ended the hypnosis session, leaving each person with what is called a posthypnotic suggestion, an instruction to carry out an action while not hypnotized.

Days later, the subjects entered the brain scanner.

In highly hypnotizables, when Dr. Raz's instructions came over the intercom, the Stroop effect was obliterated, he said. The subjects saw English words as gibberish and named colors instantly. But for those who were resistant to hypnosis, the Stroop effect prevailed, rendering them significantly slower in naming the colors.

When the brain scans of the two groups were compared, a distinct pattern appeared. Among the hypnotizables, Dr. Raz said, the visual area of the brain that usually decodes written words did not become active. And a region in the front of the brain that usually detects conflict was similarly dampened.

Top-down processes overrode brain circuits devoted to reading and detecting conflict, Dr. Raz said, although he did not know exactly how that happened. Those results appeared in July in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

A number of other recent studies of brain imaging point to similar top-down brain mechanisms under the influence of suggestion. Highly hypnotizable people were able to "drain" color from a colorful abstract drawing or "add" color to the same drawing rendered in gray tones. In each case, the parts of their brains involved in color perception were differently activated.

Brain scans show that the control mechanisms for deciding what to do in the face of conflict become uncoupled when people are hypnotized. Top-down processes override sensory, or bottom-up information, said Dr. Stephen M. Kosslyn, a neuroscientist at Harvard. People think that sights, sounds and touch from the outside world constitute reality. But the brain constructs what it perceives based on past experience, Dr. Kosslyn said.

Most of the time bottom-up information matches top-down expectation, Dr. Spiegel said. But hypnosis is interesting because it creates a mismatch. "We imagine something different, so it is different," he said.

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

"fallenness in reverse" (Reply)

thanks for the comment on the blog, Devon. It is the best first comment I could have hoped for -- other than ones selling penis enlargement pills. Of course there is no "perfect pulse" / perfect infamous willful body -- except in the imagination? Hence "the survival of images"? The virtual body?

I was just reading today the debate between Kojeve / Leo Strauss after Strauss's *On Tyranny* and Kojeve's quotation of Hegel (which I paraphrase): Spirit is that wound which leaves no scars. Maybe I want to reverse that -- wanting to locate scars where there were never wounds. A "perfect" scar? My ongoing "traumatic discourse".

Haunted also right now by these Mandala tapestries I just saw at the Natural History museum, especially the spaces reserved for "tortured souls" and wondrous masks hanging behind displays. Of the Mandalas we might say the same thing my friend Gordon observed of the dinosaurs: that they are entirely "too much of this world," where I take the normality of tortured souls and dinosaurs alike as a sign of our virtuality or fallenness in reverse (perhaps more terrifying than being fallen, Felix Culpa, etc.)

Monday, November 21, 2005

The Survival of Images*

As yet
what you didn’t
remember before
comes back
the consequence of what
you didn’t
remember before
keeps coming
the way he
will be remembered
not yet beside
in perfect pulse
of consequence
what you couldn’t
to not die
and come back.


My consequence

of the light
(the clear light)

not breathing

and again - not yet stuck
to the walls again

in pieces of consequence

of this and that

moment to not forget
and to forget.


What you can’t
term time you call
the will

the immense
will to promise
things and write

a parent’s fate
in blood
what you can’t term time.

What you shouldn’t
term actual you must
imagine, caroling

in another spring-
of the image:

the blood you choose to enact
closing the tragic
circles of cruel performance,
of willingnesses
promising another
means of ascension.

Sprit dictates this: that we
be punctual in not having grasped
our death.

Liberation, then
of all time in
“hearing” time
spririt dictates
what we must term here:

The event of them taking the bus in
or us
taking the train out.

The accretion of bad moments.

The event of her speaking
without music

to imagine
to reveal

*for DP & EN-S